Skip to content

CASE DETAILS

Charge(s): Assault Causing Bodily Harm, Break and Enter, Robbery, Mischief Under, Assault with a Weapon, Breach of Recognizance x3
Location: Picton, Ontario
Our Client(s): Mr. M
Year: 2019
Lawyer/Paralegal: Virginia Dolinska
Ottawa Criminal Lawyer - Virginia DolinskaLEARN MORE

Please Note: Past results not predictive of future results.

The Background

Mr. M was the only adult accused, he was charged with three other individuals, one male and two females, who were all under 18 years of age. Mr. M’s girlfriend was a co-accused. Previous to the incident, the complainant engaged in some nuisance behaviours towards Mr. M’s girlfriend and the other female co-accused. Mr. M wanted the complainant to stop the behaviour and teach him a lesson which went too far and consequently meant that Mr. M was potentially facing at a jail sentence in the range of four years. Mr. M and the three other co-accuseds entered the complainant’s home during the night and assaulted him. A rubber mullet was held by Mr. M who threatened to use it on the complainant. A substantial quantity of cash and marijuana was taken from the residence. There was some damage to the property as a result of the incident. The complainant’s neighbours and some passersby were able to identify Mr. M and the other co-accused. Mr. M was arrested the same night. He was released with a number of strict conditions, including a condition prohibiting contact with all co-accused, including his girlfriend. While the charges were pending and negotiations with the Crown were ongoing, Mr. M breached his release conditions on three separate occasions. He contacted and met his co-accused girlfriend when he was prohibited to do so. He spent six days in custody between his releases on bail for the breach charges.

The Goals

The goal was to keep Mr. M out of a lengthy jail sentence. The other co-accused were all under 18, and would therefore get youth sentences. Mr. M was prosecuted as an adult. The charges Mr. M was facing were indictable offences, which means that the penalties are much harsher.

The Strategy

Given the evidence against Mr. M as well as his confession, going to trial would be extremely risky especially given the fact that a lengthy custody period would be imposed. Lengthy negotiations and plea-bargaining was made with the Crown and additional discussions were done with the judge in order to craft a sentence Mr. M could accept. A pre-sentence report was ordered which allows a probation officer to interview the defendant and his family after which sentencing recommendations are made.

The Results

Mr. M entered a plea to break and enter, assault with a weapon and one count of breach. All other charges were withdrawn. Mr. M was sentenced to 12 months house arrest which included, amongst others, an exception allowing Mr. M to continue his employment. A 12 month probation order would follow upon the completion of the house arrest sentence.

FREE CONSULTATION

Tell us a bit about yourself and the situation.  Completing this form helps us book your free consultation with the most appropriate lawyer at our firm and at a time that is most convenient to you.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Let's start with the basics. What is your name?

Please note that the submission of this form does not mean that we are your retained lawyer. This is a form establishing preliminary information regarding the scheduling of a free, 30-minute consultation. Any personal information collected through means such as consultation forms will not be conveyed or shared except to the extent necessary to properly represent you and your case. Aitken Robertson will never sell any personal information. We value your privacy.