skip to Main Content
City: Peterborough, Ontario
Year: 2019
Our Client: Mr. C.
Charge(s): Over 80
Lawyer:  Dan Lemaire
Dan Lemaire - Criminal Lawyer
Learn About Dan Lemaire

Case Study: Over 80

Background Allegations

After a collision with a telephone pole, police were called to the scene to investigate. The client was arrested for impaired driving contrary to section 320.14(a) of the Criminal Code. Mr. C. was taken back to the police station for breath testing and was subsequently charged with operating a conveyance with 80 or greater mg of alcohol per 100 ml of blood contrary to section 320.14(1)(b) of the Code as well. After some perfunctory efforts to contact his lawyer of choice, police facilitated contact with Duty Counsel.

Crown Position

The Crown wanted a plea to the “over 80” charge for a $1,000 fine and a one year driving prohibition.

Goal

The client was a young first-time offender who wanted to go to university and start a career. He wanted to avoid a criminal record.

 

The Strategy

After pre-trial negotiations with the Crown, Mr. Lemaire was able to show that Mr. C.’s right to counsel (lawyer) of choice – as protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms – had been infringed.

 

Verdict

The Crown agreed to resolve the case with a plea to “careless driving” under the Highway Traffic Act. The “over 80” charge was withdrawn. Mr. C. avoided a criminal record as well as implications for his driver’s licence.

Please Note: Past results not predictive of future results.

Google Rating
4.4
Back To Top