skip to Main Content

Charged with DUI in Ontario? Fight The Charges.
Toll-free at 1-800-668-1657 or

Changes to How the Federal Crown Deals with Breaches of Drug Bails for People with Substance Use Issues

What is the new guideline?

A new policy directive from the Public Prosecution Service published April 1, 2019 hopes to change how the service deals with those accused persons addicted to drugs who breach conditions placed on them while on bail. Often, when persons charged with drug offences are released on bail or even from the police station, they are given conditions to obey that include abstaining from possessing or using any non-prescribed drug, or possessing drug paraphernalia. Another often-imposed condition is to refrain from being in a certain neighbourhood that is deemed to be an area known for drug use or being in the general area where the offence is alleged to have occurred.

Why would someone addicted to drugs agree to these conditions?

Addiction makes people do a lot of things they would not do if they were not addicted. Once someone has been arrested, they often agree to anything that will result in them being released. Or, they may very well believe that they will be able to comply, that is, until the hard reality kicks in and the client breaches the condition.

Then what happens?

When these addicts breach their conditions, they are often brought into custody and, when they are subsequently released, it puts them at a higher risk of overdosing because the time they’ve spent in custody affects their tolerance of opioids. The number of people who die as a result of overdose is not just a justice issue but also a public health issue.

How will this help?

The new guideline sets out to address the epidemic of overdoses and decrease the risk by focusing on those short periods of incarceration.

The new guideline includes several practices that should be used unless there are public safety concerns:

  • To minimize or eliminate the imposition of certain conditions on those accused who have a substance use disorder.
  • Not to impose conditions such as “not to possess drugs” or “not to possess drug paraphernalia”
  • Not to impose broad area restrictions. If it is necessary to prohibit an accused from being in a certain neighbourhood, the area should be tailored to the specific case.
  • If a breach of condition charge is laid, there should be an effort to deal with the new charge on an out-of-custody basis unless there are public safety concerns.

These guidelines show some insight into the epidemic of drug addiction and overdose. The Government of Canada on its website indicates that for the period January 2016 to September 2018, there were more than 10,000 deaths attributed to opioid overdose (click here to download). If these guidelines help just one person from overdosing, it is well worth it.

Opt In Image
Get our Free Book

A Guide to Bail: Because There is No Get Out of Jail Free Card.

Mary-Clare MacKinnon

Mary-Clare MacKinnon joined the Aitken Robertson Team in 2015 to assist the firm with their bail hearings in courts all across Ontario. She brings many years of decorated experience in the field of law to the table, all the while, having a background in music and education.

Share This Post

Request Free Consultation
Free Criminal Charges Book

Free Criminal Charges Book

Fight The Charges! A Guide to Common Criminal Charges.

Get the Free Book

Free DUI Book

Free DUI Book

17 Secrets to Helping You Survive Your DUI Charge.

Get the Free Book

Free Bail Book

Free Bail Book

A Guide to Bail: Because There is No Get Out of Jail Free Card

Get the Free Book

Some of Our Google Reviews

I had my first trouble with law couple of months and we found Edmund Chang. He helped me through all the process professionally moreover, he really cares about my best interest, he will check if I comfortable with all decisions we were going to make and if not, he will not push it. Other things that really stand out, he is approachable as well as responsive to follow up. In the end, we settled the case and I can move more
Krystal Stacy
17:19 15 Jun 18
I was charged with over 0.80 and Impaired Driving charges. I didn't think I had any chance, but Justin Marchant managed to get me out with a careless driving charge. Thanks to him, I don't have a criminal record!!! Very friendly, sharp, professional, and dedicated individual. He did a great job prepping me for the trial, and prepping for the case. I highly recommend this firm, as if it wasn't for them, I'm not sure what would have happened to my life. I made a nasty mistake, one which I will never ever make again. Some lessons have a big price to be more
Sean Jamali
15:20 07 Jun 18
Recently I was charged with over .80, Justin Marchand help me WIN this charge, from the moment I contacted him, he was very professional and upfront, He always responded to my calls and answered all my questions, He prepared me really well before trial. I would 100% recommend him and his team, Job Well done… “Sometimes good people make mistakes”read more
17:16 07 Jun 18
Mr. Marchand is an amazing lawyer. He is very personable and professional. My case was a very long and drawn out case, but Mr. Marchand always kept up with everything and I was always well informed. I really appreciated that he would take the time to fully explain his thought process/strategy and was never condescending. Even though this was a stressful time, Mr. Marchand made it a great experience and took care of more
Rochelle Jenifer
17:30 15 Jun 18
Once again amazing ! I am writing this review as I always refer my friends to this firm. THEY ARE THE BEST ! My friend was pulled over at the us border on a random check and in turn got charged with a refusal. My friend did not know that refusing to take a breathalyzer was a criminal offence. In fact as soon as he realized it he asked the officers to take it but they refused him. In turn he was charged with a refusal. Aitken Robertson specializes in DUI and cases such as this.. so it was an immediate call to them that i put in for him. Right then and there they took over. As usual, they offered a payment plan and of course they took care of everything all the pre-trial meetings etc. Justin was the laywer for him and not only is he the MOST thorough he is the most out for justice. He found the errors that the officers made and he used it to my friends advantage. He went above and beyond to find the best resolution with the crown. He went above and beyond to give my friend all his options. And the best part is that NO CRIMINAL CHARGES. It was reduced basically down to a speeding ticket as a result of Justins hard work. The whole firm is stellar. They take time to go through your disclosure to confirm any and all details are correct.The justice system is a corrupted one and im thankful these lawyers know how to find a way to help us through that. Justin once again did an amazing job. Susan at the firm is great she helps out with payment plans etc. Brenda is great. Robert of course its just a great team of laywers. Do not go anywhere else ! I will recommend them time and time more
19:28 26 Jun 18
When my daughter's boyfriend had a problem I looked up Jordan Tekenos-Levy. Jordan did an amazing job defending this young man. He showed compassion and care in a very sensitive issue. Jordan is a great lawyer, he fights hard for his clients and ensures their loved ones are kept in the loop during the entire process. He is honest and doesn't sugar coat the situation. I would highly recommend his services. We owe him a huge debt of gratitude and I wish him all the best in the more
Laurene Smith
02:58 16 Nov 18
I was falsely accused of a crime and I sought out representation. I did not know exactly where to go, I was in a panic as I've never seriously run afoul with law enforcement. Mr. Nathan Baker and his staff were assigned to my case, and I am thankful that they were. Knowing I was innocent I still was worried about how everything was going to play out as I wondered 'how could this even be happening'. Mr Baker and his staff helped walk me through the court process that was completely unfamiliar to me, besides what Id seen on television. It was a two year process, and every step of the way all my questions and inquisitions were answered and put at ease. I give this Firm my full endorsement, they believed in me, supported my case and followed through on every detail pertaining to it, and defended me to a correct Not Guilty verdict. For that I will be forever grateful. I've never had the need for an attorney to represent me before the false accusation, and I hope I never need it again. But if I do, I'd want this firm to represent more
Zak Piva
03:06 28 Oct 18
I would like to thank the lawyers at Aitken Robertson especially Philip Stiles and Lavina Inbar for helping me thru this most difficult time.Everyone i was in contact with were very polite and professional.Being a very high stress time of my life i could not have been happier to hear a "Not Guilty " verdict.I will always recommend Aitken Robertson to anyone i hear of needing a good lawyer.Thank you all very muchMauriceread more
Maurice Flight
20:22 31 Oct 18
Justin provided thorough and caring representation for my friend who had a court proceedings. I would recommend Justin and the Aitken Robertson team to anyone in a similar situation. Thanks!
Rexy H
19:26 08 Sep 18
Google Rating
Back To Top