Criminal Defence

Our client Mr. C, and the complainant were involved in a long-term relationship. Despite being in a committed relationship, both parties resided separately, neither had a criminal history, and there were no previous reports of physical violence between the two beforehand.

Our client, Mr. T, was the subject of an investigation in relation to allegations that he had engaged in sexual misconduct with a minor over an approximate two-year period. Following reports from the complainant that indicated repeated inappropriate sexual contact, Mr. T provided a cautioned statement to the police admitting to certain acts, with the complainant also corroborating some aspects of the allegations.

Our client, Mr. S, became the focus of an Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) investigation following allegations made against him by a young complainant. According to her, she met Mr. S for the first time at a convenience store, who identified himself by using a false name and age. Mr. S was said to have requested the complainant’s phone number and offered to give her a ride. It was alleged that during the drive, Mr. S directed inappropriate remarks toward her, commented on her clothing, and tried to persuade the complainant to spend more time together. Mr. S was also alleged to have contacted her through an online platform as a means to meet again in the coming weeks.

Mr. G was charged following a difficult separation with Ms. X, the mother of his child. They were going through oppositional family court proceedings in a dispute over access to his growing child when Ms. X went to the police making allegations that he had shared intimate images of her without her consent.

Our client, Mr. B contended that the allegations made against him were untrue and did not reflect the reality of the situation. The goal going into things was to get an acquittal.

Our client was investigated in connection with serious allegations arising from unexplained injuries sustained by his infant child. The investigation began following a referral to child protection authorities (CAS) and police, after pediatric medical professionals identified multiple fractures in the child, prompting a criminal investigation into the cause of the injuries. Both parents were interviewed during the early stages of the investigation, and Mr. K voluntarily participated in a police interview at a hospital setting.

Our client, Mr. I, was charged with assault following an incident at a bar that he was visiting with his previous partner. Mr. I was having a conversation with his ex-partner when the complainant approached and began forcing himself on her.

It was alleged that Mr. G struck his wife in the head one time, leading her to bleed and eventually need stitches. This unfortunate incident led to Mr. G being charged with domestic assault.

Our client, Mr. W, found himself in a stressful situation following an incident with his wife, Mrs. W, who was the complainant in this case. The couple had been married for a few years, shared two children and were expecting another when they let their anger get the best of them and got into a physical altercatio

Our client had been serving in the military for over twenty years when he found himself in a difficult situation following years of turmoil with his son. His son claimed that he assaulted him several times during his childhood and teenage years, consequently resulting in our client being charged with assault and assault causing bodily harm.

Our client, Mr. S, found himself in a difficult situation after the complainant, a close family member, contacted police claiming that he sexually assaulted her in the 1980s. The complainant had told police that there were several incidents in which Mr. S had inappropriately touched her when she was a child and he was a teenager. Mr. S adamantly denied these allegations and claimed that the complainant had a potential motive to fabricate.