skip to Main Content

Charged with DUI in Ontario? Fight The Charges.
Toll-free at 1-800-668-1657 or freeconsult@callalawyer.ca

Charged With Fraud – Why? What Will Happen Now?

If you have been charged with fraud, you have come to the right place. At Aitken Robertson, our knowledgeable and skilled criminal defence lawyers regularly handle fraud charges. You may be confused and worried about your charge, and understandably so. Keep reading to learn about how fraud charges are dealt with under the Criminal Code of Canada.

The Law

According to the Criminal Code, Fraud is defined in section 380(1) as follows:

Fraud

380 (1) Every one who, by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, whether or not it is a false pretence within the meaning of this Act, defrauds the public or any person, whether ascertained or not, of any property, money or valuable security or any service,

(a) is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to a term of imprisonment not exceeding fourteen years, where the subject-matter of the offence is a testamentary instrument or the value of the subject-matter of the offence exceeds five thousand dollars; or

(b) is guilty

(i) of an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years, or

(ii) of an offence punishable on summary conviction, where the value of the subject-matter of the offence does not exceed five thousand dollars.

As you can see, there are a number of complex elements in the way in which the criminal offence of fraud is laid out. Let us try to simplify it for you.

The Crown’s Onus to Prove the Offence

The Crown has to be able to prove the elements of the offence of fraud beyond a reasonable doubt in order to secure a conviction. In particular, the Crown will have to show the following:

  • The identity of the accused
  • The date and time of the incident
  • The jurisdiction the offence took place including region and province
  • That the complainant owned something of value(property, money, valuable security, or a service)
  • That the accused deprived the complainant of something of value or was put at risk of losing something of value
  • The ownership, value and continuity of the property, money, or service, including whether it is over $5,000 or under $5,000
  • That the deprivation must have been caused by deceit, falsehood, or other fraudulent means
  • That the accused intended to defraud the complainant or had knowledge that the conduct could result in deprivation

With respect to the documents involved in the alleged fraud that took place, the Crown will have to show the following:

  • The date and time of any false documents
  • The jurisdiction(including region and province) where documents were signed
  • The identity of person who signed the documents
  • Whether any documents were made “in the ordinary course of business” pursuant to the Canada Evidence Act

The essential elements to be proven are the date and time, jurisdiction and identity of the accused.

The Actus Reus and the Mens Rea of the Offence

Actus Reus

The actus reus refers to the alleged criminal “act” and the mens rea refers to the “mental intent” of the accused to commit the alleged act. The actus reus is made out by the Crown where:

  1. there was a prohibited act of deceit, a falsehood or some other fraudulent means

and

  1. there was a deprivation caused by the prohibited act, either an actual loss or a pecuniary interest at risk.

The two essential elements to be proven are the dishonesty and deprivation to prove the offence of fraud. The issue of actus reus is determined objectively as to whether a reasonable person would consider the conduct to be “dishonest”.

Mens Rea

The mens rea is the subjective awareness of undertaking the prohibited act and awareness of the risk of depriving another of property. The awareness of the risk of deprivation includes recklessness as to the knowledge. The personal feelings of the “morality or honesty” of the act is irrelevant.

Where an accused person makes use of the funds obtained through wilful blindness, it will be considered dishonest. “Dishonesty” is determined on an objective standard determined by what a reasonable person would consider dishonest. Dishonesty can also include non-disclosure where a reasonable person would consider it dishonest.

A mistaken belief that the complainant owed the accused money will not justify the collecting of the funds by deceit. Where the accused person knew that he or she was undertaking the prohibited act that could cause a deprivation to the complainant but hoping that the deprivation would not take place cannot be a defence.

A few examples of fraud are:

  • breach of trust
  • material non-disclosure
  • breach of contractual obligations
  • fraudulent misrepresentation
  • misuse of assets
  • unauthorized diversion of funds or property

The Aitken Robertson Team

As evidenced above, the offence of fraud carries with it legal complexities that our criminal defence lawyers are trained to handle. With years of practical experience and a solid understanding of criminal law, our lawyers can work with you to advance a defence. Call our office for a telephone or in-person 30-minute free consultation to discuss your case and how we can assist in your defence.

 

Yasmine Al-Zaman

Yasmine’s patience, compassion and understanding allow her to work collaboratively and effectively with her clients. She appreciates the level of fear and confusion most people feel when confronted with the legal system. With that in mind, Yasmine puts her best foot forward to offer quality legal services.

Share This Post

Request Free Consultation
Free Criminal Charges Book

Free Criminal Charges Book

Fight The Charges! A Guide to Common Criminal Charges.

Get the Free Book

Free DUI Book

Free DUI Book

17 Secrets to Helping You Survive Your DUI Charge.

Get the Free Book

Free Bail Book

Free Bail Book

A Guide to Bail: Because There is No Get Out of Jail Free Card

Get the Free Book

Some of Our Google Reviews

I had my first trouble with law couple of months and we found Edmund Chang. He helped me through all the process professionally moreover, he really cares about my best interest, he will check if I comfortable with all decisions we were going to make and if not, he will not push it. Other things that really stand out, he is approachable as well as responsive to follow up. In the end, we settled the case and I can move on.read more
Krystal Stacy
17:19 15 Jun 18
I was charged with over 0.80 and Impaired Driving charges. I didn't think I had any chance, but Justin Marchant managed to get me out with a careless driving charge. Thanks to him, I don't have a criminal record!!! Very friendly, sharp, professional, and dedicated individual. He did a great job prepping me for the trial, and prepping for the case. I highly recommend this firm, as if it wasn't for them, I'm not sure what would have happened to my life. I made a nasty mistake, one which I will never ever make again. Some lessons have a big price to be learned.read more
Sean Jamali
15:20 07 Jun 18
Recently I was charged with over .80, Justin Marchand help me WIN this charge, from the moment I contacted him, he was very professional and upfront, He always responded to my calls and answered all my questions, He prepared me really well before trial. I would 100% recommend him and his team, Job Well done… “Sometimes good people make mistakes”read more
S F
17:16 07 Jun 18
Mr. Marchand is an amazing lawyer. He is very personable and professional. My case was a very long and drawn out case, but Mr. Marchand always kept up with everything and I was always well informed. I really appreciated that he would take the time to fully explain his thought process/strategy and was never condescending. Even though this was a stressful time, Mr. Marchand made it a great experience and took care of everything.read more
Rochelle Jenifer
17:30 15 Jun 18
Once again amazing ! I am writing this review as I always refer my friends to this firm. THEY ARE THE BEST ! My friend was pulled over at the us border on a random check and in turn got charged with a refusal. My friend did not know that refusing to take a breathalyzer was a criminal offence. In fact as soon as he realized it he asked the officers to take it but they refused him. In turn he was charged with a refusal. Aitken Robertson specializes in DUI and cases such as this.. so it was an immediate call to them that i put in for him. Right then and there they took over. As usual, they offered a payment plan and of course they took care of everything all the pre-trial meetings etc. Justin was the laywer for him and not only is he the MOST thorough he is the most out for justice. He found the errors that the officers made and he used it to my friends advantage. He went above and beyond to find the best resolution with the crown. He went above and beyond to give my friend all his options. And the best part is that NO CRIMINAL CHARGES. It was reduced basically down to a speeding ticket as a result of Justins hard work. The whole firm is stellar. They take time to go through your disclosure to confirm any and all details are correct.The justice system is a corrupted one and im thankful these lawyers know how to find a way to help us through that. Justin once again did an amazing job. Susan at the firm is great she helps out with payment plans etc. Brenda is great. Robert of course its just a great team of laywers. Do not go anywhere else ! I will recommend them time and time again.read more
TAYLOR STEVENS
19:28 26 Jun 18
When my daughter's boyfriend had a problem I looked up Jordan Tekenos-Levy. Jordan did an amazing job defending this young man. He showed compassion and care in a very sensitive issue. Jordan is a great lawyer, he fights hard for his clients and ensures their loved ones are kept in the loop during the entire process. He is honest and doesn't sugar coat the situation. I would highly recommend his services. We owe him a huge debt of gratitude and I wish him all the best in the future.read more
Laurene Smith
02:58 16 Nov 18
I was falsely accused of a crime and I sought out representation. I did not know exactly where to go, I was in a panic as I've never seriously run afoul with law enforcement. Mr. Nathan Baker and his staff were assigned to my case, and I am thankful that they were. Knowing I was innocent I still was worried about how everything was going to play out as I wondered 'how could this even be happening'. Mr Baker and his staff helped walk me through the court process that was completely unfamiliar to me, besides what Id seen on television. It was a two year process, and every step of the way all my questions and inquisitions were answered and put at ease. I give this Firm my full endorsement, they believed in me, supported my case and followed through on every detail pertaining to it, and defended me to a correct Not Guilty verdict. For that I will be forever grateful. I've never had the need for an attorney to represent me before the false accusation, and I hope I never need it again. But if I do, I'd want this firm to represent me.read more
Zak Piva
03:06 28 Oct 18
I would like to thank the lawyers at Aitken Robertson especially Philip Stiles and Lavina Inbar for helping me thru this most difficult time.Everyone i was in contact with were very polite and professional.Being a very high stress time of my life i could not have been happier to hear a "Not Guilty " verdict.I will always recommend Aitken Robertson to anyone i hear of needing a good lawyer.Thank you all very muchMauriceread more
Maurice Flight
20:22 31 Oct 18
Justin provided thorough and caring representation for my friend who had a court proceedings. I would recommend Justin and the Aitken Robertson team to anyone in a similar situation. Thanks!
Rexy H
19:26 08 Sep 18
Google Rating
4.9
Back To Top