SUCCESS STORIES

Our client Mr. C, and the complainant were involved in a long-term relationship. Despite being in a committed relationship, both parties resided separately, neither had a criminal history, and there were no previous reports of physical violence between the two beforehand.

Our client, Mr. T, was the subject of an investigation in relation to allegations that he had engaged in sexual misconduct with a minor over an approximate two-year period. Following reports from the complainant that indicated repeated inappropriate sexual contact, Mr. T provided a cautioned statement to the police admitting to certain acts, with the complainant also corroborating some aspects of the allegations.

Our client, Mr. S, became the focus of an Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) investigation following allegations made against him by a young complainant. According to her, she met Mr. S for the first time at a convenience store, who identified himself by using a false name and age. Mr. S was said to have requested the complainant’s phone number and offered to give her a ride. It was alleged that during the drive, Mr. S directed inappropriate remarks toward her, commented on her clothing, and tried to persuade the complainant to spend more time together. Mr. S was also alleged to have contacted her through an online platform as a means to meet again in the coming weeks.

Our client, Mr. P, was charged with Criminal Harassment following allegations arising out of the breakdown of a personal relationship. The complainant alleged that our client engaged in repeated unwanted communication and conduct that caused her to fear for her safety.

Mr. G was charged following a difficult separation with Ms. X, the mother of his child. They were going through oppositional family court proceedings in a dispute over access to his growing child when Ms. X went to the police making allegations that he had shared intimate images of her without her consent.

Our client, Mr. B contended that the allegations made against him were untrue and did not reflect the reality of the situation. The goal going into things was to get an acquittal.

Our client, Mr. T, was charged with operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration exceeding 80 mg and dangerous operation of a motor vehicle following a traffic stop conducted by police. The stop occurred after police received a report from a civilian alleging aggressive driving behaviour.

Our client, Ms. C, was charged with impaired operation following a motor vehicle stop initiated by police in response to a 911 call, contrary to section 320.14(1)(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada. The call did not report impaired driving, unsafe vehicle operation, or any Highway Traffic Act concerns; officers simply responded to a “suspicious vehicle” call, absent any lawful basis for detention.

Our client was investigated in connection with serious allegations arising from unexplained injuries sustained by his infant child. The investigation began following a referral to child protection authorities (CAS) and police, after pediatric medical professionals identified multiple fractures in the child, prompting a criminal investigation into the cause of the injuries. Both parents were interviewed during the early stages of the investigation, and Mr. K voluntarily participated in a police interview at a hospital setting.

Our client, Mr. I, was charged with assault following an incident at a bar that he was visiting with his previous partner. Mr. I was having a conversation with his ex-partner when the complainant approached and began forcing himself on her.

It was alleged that Mr. G struck his wife in the head one time, leading her to bleed and eventually need stitches. This unfortunate incident led to Mr. G being charged with domestic assault.