Skip to content


Charge(s): Care or Control of a Motor Vehicle After Having Consumed Alcohol in Such a Quantity That the Concentration Thereof in his Blood Exceeded 80 mg in 100 Millilitres of Blood
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Our Client(s): Mr. G
Complainant(s): Durham Regional Police Service
Year: 2015
Lawyer/Paralegal: T. Edmund Chan
Edmund Chan - Criminal LawyerLEARN MORE

Please Note: Past results not predictive of future results.

The Background

In the very early, dark hours of a winter’s morning, a white Toyota crashed into a hydro pole, then into a mattress and box spring that had been left on the curb, and then a second hydro pole. Debris was scattered all over the road and the lawns of the nearby houses. The mattress was halfway up a tree. Another driver witnessed the Toyota hit and wrap around the second hydro pole. An ambulance that happened to be passing moments afterwards stopped. That ambulance was already carrying a patient to hospital so the driver called for, and was sent, another ambulance. Police arrived while paramedics and fire services were extracting the unconscious driver from the mangled vehicle. The second ambulance transported this injured driver to hospital. At the hospital, blood was drawn from a patient identified by the hospital as Mr. G The police obtained blood alcohol concentration readings from a blood sample that they attributed to Mr. G., that were close to 155 mg in 100 millilitres of blood – nearly twice the amount of the legal limit of 80 mg.

The Goals

Mr. G needed to avoid all the repercussions of the criminal record that would flow from a conviction of the Over 80 offence. In particular, he was concerned that the insurance on his $40,000 vehicle which was demolished, but on which he was still making payments, would be voided were he convicted of this offence.

The Strategy

Our strategy was two-pronged. We would challenge the blood sample evidence in terms of the continuity of the sample from a person identified by the hospital as Mr. G, to the point of analysis by a hospital laboratory technician. We would additionally bring into question the identity of the driver of the Toyota, purported to be Mr. G. The Crown had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that Mr. G had care or control of the Toyota when it crashed on the night in question. We had to raise a reasonable doubt as to “identity.”

The Results

The judge found that he could accept the continuity of the blood sample from Mr. G to the technician who analyzed it, and therefore find that Mr. G’s blood alcohol level was well above the legal limit at the time in question. However, despite what the judge called “interesting coincidences” in the case, we were able to raise a reasonable doubt as to the identity of the driver of the crashed Toyota, so that the judge found that the Crown could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. G before the court, had anything to do with the Toyota that crashed into the two hydro poles and the mattress that winter’s morning. Mr. G was therefore acquitted of the charge.


Tell us a bit about yourself and the situation.  Completing this form helps us book your free consultation with the most appropriate lawyer at our firm and at a time that is most convenient to you.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Let's start with the basics. What is your name?
More information on our privacy policy can be read here: Privacy Policy.

Please note that the submission of this form does not mean that we are your retained lawyer. This is a form establishing preliminary information regarding the scheduling of a free, 30-minute consultation. Any personal information collected through means such as consultation forms will not be conveyed or shared except to the extent necessary to properly represent you and your case. Aitken Robertson will never sell any personal information. We value your privacy.

SMS Disclosure: By providing a telephone number for SMS/Text purposes and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.

Back To Top